ChuckCheese Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I liked The Seed(?) a lot. This should be good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qwerty18 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 As far as lyrics go, MTM and ATS were a lot more mature lyrically then LT is. I remember an interview with Chester back in early 2012 saying the lyrics in LT were about relationships. In Pieces was an example of a song about a bad relationship that still remained mature lyrically. Lyrics like ''I wanna see you suffer all alone in your misery'' or ''This time I've finally let you go'' don't seem very mature to me. But it's not just about lyrics. It has to be lyrically immature and musically immature, much like the music on early LP work was or kids like that won't listen to it. LP could make a song that lyrically was about having a temper tantrum and have a ATS style backing it up musically and it wouldn't do as well for those kids as a heavy guitar and drum oriented rock track about having a temper tantrum. For example, Blackout in a way could be about throwing a fit (the first half). One Step Closer literally is about throwing a fit. But the music for the songs are drastically different. Which IS STILL a bigger hit with those kinds of people? OSC. LP made the mistake of making the same album with Meteora and that just branded it into non LP fans minds that that is the only kind of music they can make. MTM was a good attempt at breaking away, it did the job. Remember how mad all those kids were in 2007? Then ATS was the perfect attempt, it killed off whatever nu-metal kids were still hanging by because of MTM and New Divide. They accomplished what they wanted. But then in 2012, they released fucking BID and LT. Which is like a huge step back. LT to me has always sounded like the album that came IN BETWEEN MTM AND ATS. It makes sense to me, the songs sound more like New Divide. New Divide was in between MTM and ATS.You've been hanging around on LPA too much... Just kidding, eh. But, there isn't such things as "musically immature". Lyrics can be immature, but not the music. Kids like heavy guitars? Good for them. That won't stop me for also liking them, even if I'm not exactly a kid anymore. And "accomplished what they wanted" argument is funny, since I guess, they accomplish what they want with each album release. They did wanted to make reminescent from the past music this time, and so they did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geki Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 You've been hanging around on LPA too much... Just kidding, eh. But, there isn't such things as "musically immature". Lyrics can be immature, but not the music. Kids like heavy guitars? Good for them. That won't stop me for also liking them, even if I'm not exactly a kid anymore. And "accomplished what they wanted" argument is funny, since I guess, they accomplish what they want with each album release. They did wanted to make reminescent from the past music this time, and so they did. Seriously? There is SUCH a sing as musically immature. I don't even want to get into this argument to be honest. But there definitely is such a thing as musical immaturity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hahninator Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Also, I'll take CoG over LGM any day, simply because CoG sounds good live and LGM sounds like complete and utter shit. Yeah I agree. Hopefully the new stuff is stuff they can perform live without lipsynching. *cough*WTCFM, Iridescent, IMR*cough* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOHAIL_Lq Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Yeah I agree. Hopefully the new stuff is stuff they can perform live without lipsynching. *cough*WTCFM, Iridescent, IMR*cough* lipsynching?they do????????? nahhhhhhh man disappointed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robrobbsen Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Yeah I agree. Hopefully the new stuff is stuff they can perform live without lipsynching. *cough*WTCFM, Iridescent, IMR*cough* Proof it otherwise i wouldn´t belive why they would do that maybe they back up some of thoose "ooooooh" background vocals but never the main ones Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[AndOne] Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 They lip sync the gang vocals parts. Iridescent for example, it sounds live exactly like on the record. It always sounds the same. They either lip sync or you can't hear them at all. I'm quite sure about In My Remains, the part when they sing "one by one, one by one" in gang vocals, it's way too perfect live. Phoenix really does sing on the song. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LinkinMark Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 They lip sync the gang vocals parts. Iridescent for example, it sounds live exactly like on the record. It always sounds the same. They either lip sync or you can't hear them at all. I'm quite sure about In My Remains, the part when they sing "one by one, one by one" in gang vocals, it's way too perfect live. Phoenix really does sing on the song. They still sing over Iridescent though. Well, I'm pretty sure Mike does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChuckCheese Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 I'm sure they do ACTUALLY sing every part most of the time, but on those three songs the album version is definitely blasted over the speakers at the same time, so that's all you hear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robrobbsen Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 but thats not what i would call lipsyncing singing over parts that are layered with probaly 7-8 voices in the studio version i would say lipsyncing is considered if the the lead vocals are played back Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qwerty18 Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 (edited) Seriously? There is SUCH a sing as musically immature. I don't even want to get into this argument to be honest. But there definitely is such a thing as musical immaturity.Yep, no need to get into this argument, you wouldn't convince me anyway, even with all caps Edited February 27, 2013 by Qwerty18 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RogueSoul Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 This topic went from the discussion of the actual purpose of the topic to a LP War to lipsyncing. Holy hell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiderSSPU Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 I love Chester's screaming, it's one of the main reason I ever got into LP the way that I did.THIS and his singing as well HT=rock M=ROCK MTM=rock ATS=is that LP? LT=rock So I think they're next project is going to be ROCK. that's a pretty good way to put it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandonR24 Posted March 13, 2013 Share Posted March 13, 2013 Being in the minority, but I want LP to just go fucking crazy and make a heavy ass record. They are getting older which I understand and that's exactly why I think they should. Rekindle that energy before one day they cant. Just make a crazy CD. People always sit there and diss Meteora, MTM but I guess being and energetic guy and into physical activities it's albums like those that get me hyped! ATS to me was so incredibly boring, sure the artistic value was great, but I became a LP fan because of the energy. So I'm obviously wanting some pumped up rock music again. And as for the soundtrack, I'm curious. I am a big fan of music scores so I'm wondering if it will be that type of feel or if it will be an album with all tracks containing vocals? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted March 13, 2013 Share Posted March 13, 2013 HT=rock M=ROCK MTM=rock ATS=is that LP? LT=rock So I think they're next project is going to be ROCK. it is similar to Astat's sig Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hahninator Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 I think they are done with The Mall music and probably are working on the new LP album right now. Ethan's website says he tracked/recorded The Mall music with LP from May to October 2012. They probably have concluded those sessions by now if he hasn't posted a single thing about it since October. There's a pic of them in the studio in September, so that sounds about right. http://www.ethanmates.com/News.html "May-Oct. 2012 Tracking new music for forthcoming feature film “The Mall”" From Joe: https://twitter.com/joehahnLP/status/248863...3030656/photo/1 (September 20) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gorast Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 So that means we're just waiting on the film. See you in 2016. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skipees Posted June 13, 2013 Author Share Posted June 13, 2013 (edited) from Mike's Instagram account: Edited June 13, 2013 by Skipees Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FearOfTheDuck Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 Water Taxi Multis? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gorast Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 Water Taxi Multis could be referring to a the part of the film that the song plays during. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skipees Posted June 14, 2013 Author Share Posted June 14, 2013 Water Taxi Multis could be referring to a the part of the film that the song plays during.sounds reasonable, but i wonder about the word "Multis". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hahninator Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 Multitracks. "Water Taxi Multis are holding up the next album." "Adam leaving LPU is holding up the next album." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skipees Posted June 14, 2013 Author Share Posted June 14, 2013 Multitracks.first time i saw the picture i was pretty sure it means Multitracks, but then i saw SomeDude comment and if the Water Taxi is just a descreption of the scene why there are Multitracks of this: maybe it's just some to do list and i'm mess them all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hahninator Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 Multitracks for the music in the scene in which there is a water taxi in The Mall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RogueSoul Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 first time i saw the picture i was pretty sure it means Multitracks, but then i saw SomeDude comment and if the Water Taxi is just a descreption of the scene why there are Multitracks of this:They use the multitracks for the song, not the water taxi... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.