Jump to content

Mike's New Tease


Jay_Sensei

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 981
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

aw damn it! I was just about to put the layers together to see what I could find!

 

Earlier I posted that the pixels looked like the mikeshinoda.com font so thats why I was going to try it.

 

Damn people being quicker than meeeeeee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would somebody with Photoshop be so kind as to post the separate layers? I'd do it myself but I don't have Photoshop on this computer.

I don't have Photoshop, but I'm working on getting individual pictures of each of the 13 frames. Just give me some time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I looked at the individual frames. THERE IS NO MESSAGE ON ANY OF THE FRAMES. I've tried looking sideways, upside down, squinting, one eye open, twirling around and looking at it really fast, looking at them with one foot. ok jk but i don't see anything! And if there is, someone prove it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have Photoshop, but I'm working on getting individual pictures of each of the 13 frames. Just give me some time.

There's going to be a minor delay with this. Windows Live Photo Gallery didn't read frames 3, 4, 5, and 6 as the complete (600 x 454) dimension. I would say that's because that's when the pixels start coming, but they actually start in frame 2; and it's the full dimension. So I'm not sure why it would do that, especially when they're all a part of the same file.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's going to be a minor delay with this. Windows Live Photo Gallery didn't read frames 3, 4, 5, and 6 as the complete (600 x 454) dimension. I would say that's because that's when the pixels start coming, but they actually start in frame 2; and it's the full dimension. So I'm not sure why it would do that, especially when they're all a part of the same file.

Screw it lol I already posted them. Read the post above yours :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't the Photoshop layers Mark was referring to and the frame-by-frame shots of the .gif animation be 2 different things?

As far as I know, Photoshop layers are like putting one thing in front of another in one photo. It doesn't have anything to do with frames. If you start removing layers, maybe something will show. I unfortunately don't have Photoshop to test it out.

Edited by letdownagain
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't the Photoshop layers Mark was referring to and the frame-by-frame shots of the .gif animation be 2 different things?

Yes they would. The frames only exist because its moving...but layers exist on all images not just animated gifs....we need the layers, not the frames!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes they would. The frames only exist because its moving...but layers exist on all images not just animated gifs....we need the layers, not the frames!

Truth!

 

Someone decompile them and upload them here!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe he meant the frames because there's 13 of them.

 

 

 

In most cases lol, but really only if you're referring to a picture that doesn't have a background (like my sig for example)

JPEG really compresses the image though. When we still need every detail we have "pixel static" doesn't help.

 

I finished up my frames. When I was flipping through the frames I realized something; I really need a girlfriend.. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...