LPsMart

I'm pretty sure they don't even have all the original stems themselves. e.g. Reading My Eyes was a direct remaster from a 1-track-tape. about the technology: what I've learned about how AI treatment does shit is shocking. you could even like extract single instruments from RME but still.. there's a difference between stems and deconstructed stems (even though the quality has increased alot over the last year.) If you're interested in deconstructing songs I suggest you getting a free trial of izotope's RX8.

dude I'm starting to believe that's why it's so hard to get hands on the multi. they've been strict about those to prevent people from knowing that producing technique to make such amazingly strong vocals. or they just treated the vocals on the 5.1 release like some sounds on CFTI I find those tracks extremely weird to listen to, they sound so heavily different

well you'd have to ask JB if he remembers, but he barely answers anything the way you'd expect him to. I would advise rearranging Emo and putting some guitar on it, I think that should basically be it, but I',m just theorizing

welcome to pop music. If you went by that theory there's plenty of songs that you could consider inspiration for other songs

yeah me too. I like to believe that apart from the Emo demo (bars???), Flower was the actual thing with live instrumental ideas behind that. like Sky and Crawling are the same thing but actually not really

I like how the site now says 4 years later... I also like how people don't use sources. Who confirmed it? we gotta push hard to get there, I don't think Mike's even thinking about that possibility. If there's enough pressure, they might do something, but Mike said nothing's planned

I doubt they would replace the very LP-ish synth in SOTD for cheap string sounds. also 2013 NRL sounds like what they did to Iridescent in a hurry. Don't know about 2013 ATL though. Sometimes I wonder if people do not have 2007 NRL offline? 'Cause in Germany MTM Tour Editions are no rarity at all. Even LPU9 is still available in some stores, so 2009 (?) ATL is still out there on sale.

wait which one am I missing rn? as martinez mentioned before, it would be insane to expect a proper mix listening on a stereo device. I know that there are Surround settings for some devices, but in fact they can't simulate that very well. IIRC you have a subwoofer in a Surround system, which would give you the expected bass stuff (I believe there is a single track/channel for that, which you can barely hear on headphones, cause it gets pushed away by channels with "higher" (more headphone-ish) frequencies). depends on how they did it. e.g. Brad had always envisioned a huge wall of sound, which is why there are sometimes layers of four guitars, which you could now get on four individual tracks, which you can't on stereo. but I agree on that concerning stuff like sweeping from left to right or adding reverb and stuff. that's just not their business, that goes even further than a remaster would go. yeah but Reanimation was all about the ambience and aura in the first place too, and 5.1 really pays off if I think, I wish I had a surround system I fucking need this. But ONLY if Mike and Brad supervise it. Especially ATS

probably just what it says. without Rahzel and DJ Q-Bert - if you cut that from the final version the song ticks in at 4:18, if you leave out some breaks here and there you can most definitely cut it down to 3:54, which suggest this being in a demo phase, which then again is pretty unlikely 'cause the album came out later the same year

yeah but as for Powerless (which was the first one I listened to on Stereo), each individual track sounds stupid enough. I can't imagine a Surround System would add much to that

I think we're all just trying to get a better look inside WY, POA, CFTI and APFMH, right? for me it's especially APFMH

nice find! it's the breakdown before the end Also this made me finally realize where I knew PNNYAHHH sound from - it's in Blue too after the first chorus Seems like the origins of Blue were called something like YA

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1JRe2qr-Zs9NjMyTl9zbnZoLVU/view?resourcekey=0-7G1_z-FmIa5ajY-knUlZOA

hahaha I was thinking the same thing, but still I wonder why this theory is infact on there. has lplu inside info from Astat/JB or is this just interpretation of JB's "The second song, with no title, incorporated a lot of hip hop. I loved the beat, the rapping was old school, and it had a simplistic guitar line with tasty harmonics that was instantly memorable. The song transitioned into an Alice In Chains-style chorus followed by a Rage Against the Machine-style guitar breakdown, with a hard-edged bridge that really impressed me." ? 'Cause that could have been any unknown song from that era, by that description.

yeah nice try hahaha. this still remains a theory

I think it wasn't their live debut, that's what I thought for years. But who knows.

scamnoda strikes once more

yeah but what's their source for this info?

yeah but what's their source? it doesn't say that it'S Dialate in the book

what's the source for this?

that's what Mike recalled. it wasn't an LP demo. sounds like a lil Chester song produced by Mike to me

I can't see that happening, I think he forgot about fine super fast and it was a one-time only thing. Also I don't know how the pandemic still strikes in the U.S. of A., but live shows are cancelled until probably 2022 here I agree, but I actually preferred Mike's solo performances for the greater part

Man... I would love to hear "fine" live...

Trollnoda at it again. I love his kind of humor also super lame interview other than that, sadly