-
Posts
386 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by LPsMart
-
I'm sorry to say it, but that's not the sample used in but rather isolated from the song, also I'm not quite sure whether it's a female, because it was sped up in the first place
-
not sure if I hear piano at all, surely no piano chords sadly EDIT: there's some subtle piano, but not the right tones might be from that show though
-
I don't care about them, neither do I know if they tracked on click
- 29 replies
-
try it out sometime, it's mind bugging. will eventually do the rest of LPU if possible, so the topic is off the table
- 29 replies
-
Just realized the SNDS1 folder is identical to PACMANNYNEW, so no such thing as an MTM folder, but rather Mike reusing certain samples. Other than that: NIN_BLUE from Xero Current was used in Lost In The Echo on the second half of the "let you gooooo" bridge. ("We don't use samples by other bands" my a** hahaha) Meeting up with a Nine Inch Nails expert today, hoping she can help out with all those NIN samples in there.
-
there's no need to, if that's on Linkinpedia. The spead sheet is run by LPLive members as well. Edit: I did the LPU 12 for you, I hope that'll be it for some time. Finding out the BPM destroys the song experience, so I truly hope this will keep you busy.
- 29 replies
-
Dude Linkinpedia is still run by this page, so this is no new information
- 29 replies
-
Sample19 from the SNDS1 folder is the main sample of Ammosick, meaning this folder could contain more MTM era samples
-
The origin of the song is unknown
-
the Xero demo is 133.133, not 133; the HT Demo is slightly faster than the Xero demo both Forgotten Demo and Rhinestone Xero Demo are at 108.108, not 110 Will you please stop posting false information now?
- 29 replies
-
so no reason at all to post this. if someone wanted to know, they could google themselves to not find out if those numbers are right
- 29 replies
-
yeah, 'cause I added it, when HT20 came out. but the fact that there's one track with the same bpm, doesn't mean they're a reliable source. I'll check the songs' BPM for you and add them to the spreadsheet EDIT: alright, those were pretty accurate, but they made huge mistakes. As said before, And One is like the only song by LP without click, so no BPM there - just a bold assumption made by a computer. Also, seemingly Mike had a little fun with numbers programming the beats, because Dialate has a BPM of 105.678 seems intended to me, as well as Reading My Eyes' 136.636. You cannot just round them up to something, because the click would speed up every beat compared to the track itself. PB, She Couldn't and S'n'M were right though, my bad. I also added the keys they're in and the time signatures. Need a little help with Could Have Been - I think it's in C# Phrygian, might also be C# Minor. I'm waiting on Astat's opinion, if he reads this.
- 29 replies
-
If you had fact checked it, you would have realized that And One isn't played on click (except the outro, which isn't 110 BPM but 100), and if it were, it would be around 115. All the sources you find googling "BPM" or "Key" of a song differ from each other, and mostly you'll find they're all wrong. I suggest you to get BPM from either linkinpedia.com (LPL) or the remix spreadsheet 2.0, which both are reliable sources. If the BPM aren't on there, you'd have to find out yourself or ask someone to help you find out.
- 29 replies
-
it's a freakin working title, not a demo this is just wrong and you know that
-
I think they were rather talking about something from early stages HPOATT-like. And i mean since Mike said that doesn't know anymore, but believes that the song started with guitars and the beeping sounds, I get why they think there must've been more to the song before they tracked it for HT. But as I mentioned before, I don't think they actually made a "demo" like Dust Brothers/Now I See. You could say that about a few more songs on HT, that had their working titles on the unmastered versions but final titles on the actual album. Which are basically exactly the same recording.
-
how should we know? I don't think we don't have anything from Harmonic Song on the multitracks. If there is something, it should basically be the drums, 'cause they decided on the name change while tracking drums. I doubt they really did a demo of that, maybe some project in ProTools to structure it. But I think it was after they had written OSC and Papercut, when they started writing PMA, but who knows? You should go ask Mike, if he remembers at all or even answers.
-
Why would anyone ever ban YOU?!
-
so we can actually tell, that the name Pushing Me Away was decided on on either March 15 or March 16, maybe that's also when the lyrics seemed about done. which would mean the song was an even closer call than we already knew it was, cause the lyrics should be finished before going into the studio. I wonder when Mike rewrote the lyrics of ITE to the final version. Very unlikely that a demo this late exists, but I would love to listen to Mike spitting the final lyrics onto the demo to try them out and check if they work, like a "Take 1 at home".
-
yeah I feel that, I know it's not perfect and it's annoying - but patience - audio engineering has improved so fast yeah seems about right (even though no stereo drums) - but everything was mixed before tracking it onto a 1-track-machine, you can hear the quality has suffered when listening to each individual track but altogether no glitches are notable. naaah definitely not. but I'm both excited and anxious about the future and what's to come
-
George Martin and Crew actually did that for The Beatles' 1, Love and the RB game, with technology we would never had believed to exist back then