Trumtram

dead by sunrise really grow on me

oh wow, just what i expected, really mature mate we ask to much... hahaha, seriously. we don't ask for the world, we are at a lowpoint of being tamed by a new rap verse, sad, huh? throwing in just ONE other song just because of the pure fun of playing it... holy crap, everyone here would go crazy and ask for HQ versions immediately.

like previously said: adding short rap parts over songs is not changing a setlist. the main set remained the same for the whole tour just because of linkin parks inability to break out from their rehearsed structures. chester has a very bad day on his singing songs. a good one with his screams, though. judging this show as a webcast compared to previous webcasts, this one is pretty bad. seeing people go crazy because mike raps something different or brad plays PMA over ITE shows just one thing: the demands of the fans have reached a deeeeeep lowpoint over the years. it's almost pathetic, honestly. now get all angry at me for pointing out what's there, you simply won't see because of blinded fanboy eyes. keep in mind, im not saying this show sucks, it doesnt, it's a normal linkin park show with a not totally great chester this day. comparing a linkin park show to shows of many other bands is just not worth the investment of time. that's my point.

that's why i said files till max 1 gb size

they don't have to! you can download without an account. it's bit slower and you can't download multiple files (you have to wait 15 minutes). still would've been perfect for stuff like "she couldn't". just a heads-up

throw the mid sized stuff (<1gb) up on rapidshare. apart from what a certain person had to moan about it, it's very fast and with an account even faster! many sites with bandwidth issues use it and it might save a lot of money. people should rather invest in an rapidshare account (about 10$ a month) than spending it to the site. it will take of a good bit of weight from your pockets and might solve the problem. plus, when lplive uses an account to upload stuff, the more people download files off of it, so you get points that you can use to extend the sites account.

well, it wasn't the live debut for ANY KIND of the song actually . at st.paul (10/13/01) joe played a short part of the song in between the set.

sounds pretty good!

"Fire" is so meh... kinda ok but so oh generic. chesters screaming might be the only thing that will never cease to amaze me. "Crawl Back In" is alright, cool solo, nice chorus but pretty average riffing. i never paid much attention to the songs DBS performed in 08. however, after making me aware if it, i did compare the versions of "My Suffering". im so shocked that they rewrote it to this vocally almost tame version. chester screaming "my suffering" is pure win, but except for being more fast paced than the previous songs i don't see anything special here either. the old version was much better! seems like it won't compete for AOTY as i hoped it would. still curious how the studio versions will sound and what else is there on the album. i'm almost afraid that the slower songs will be the best.

hey mark, if you could stop by in cologne, i would really appreciate that

glad to hear that you guys are having a great time, especially mark! hope you like germany

goodbye crewdy!

thank god im not the only one who constantly gets annoyed by this kid's attitude...

snippet sounds generic, but that's the first time for a DBS clip so far.

we are talking about linkin park, not limp bizkit

perfect video considering the project it was created in. great visuals!

he (?) is not refering to the synth, i see what he means.

there it is. a good lp song nonetheless. i always hate how blindfolded the community reviews new stuff, buts that a fanproblem i guess. personally found myself insulted by being called an idiot indirectly a few pages ago (because im critizising) but let's rather bash someone who does not have amazing english abilities and support that bashing by laughing, high school anyone? however. on the good side, this song feels pretty dynamic for a midtempo song. the WID-feel is not that present anymore judging the whole song, even though i really had to laugh at the part 3:18-3:34 because you know... WID has almost the same sing along part but okok, don't get over me again for mentioning that like i praised satan. the breakdown itself is pretty cool, but it feels TOTALLY out of context. im eager to know who of you will still remain with their "one of their best song" opinions in a year thinking about much better songs by them from ALL their previous albums. whoever feels the need to flame me just because i didn't fall for hyperventilation is pretty much pathetic. it's an opinion like all of yours and it's my right to state it, like it or not. arguing about it is one thing, but flaming is another one. thanks. if anyone is interessted in other statements about ND that aren't directly from fans (and not haters either): http://www.absolutepunk.net/showthread.php?t=1067232 but warning, there are WID comparisons aswell as negative feedback. just FYI edit: oh, and for all the guitar addicts over here: im almost sure this song brings you to sleep

quite exactly what i was trying to say but couldn't because of a lack in my foreign language skills.im satisfied that im not the only one who hears the similarity. i take back the rip-off thing, was a bit harsh. but still, im not happy with this first snippet at all. let's see if the whole thing will be better.

you got a point there in which i agree. i still got hope for the whole song and i won't take this song as a hint on any new songs from the new album. but being a fan for nearly 9 years now it makes me sad to see this band drift apart from songs like "and one", "part of me" and "forgotten". some call it evolution, but change does not equal evolution. i didn't mean to be rude but again, this snippet is pretty similar to the chorus of "what i've done" MUSICALLY. heck, even the tempo is practically the same. this judgement belongs to the SNIPPET ONLY, just to clarify that. so now, i've stated my opinion for everyone to understand. hopefully i won't get flamed just for pointing out an obvious similarity.

i judged the supposed refrain. sorry that i wrote "songs" but just compare both refrains and if you can't see it then, i can't help you.

straight from another forum: "So far it just sounds like What I've Done with less rigid drumming and a cool sounding guitar lead played over it." "If you sing the chorus of What I've Done to this song, it fits perfectly." musically it's basicly the same as "what i've done". it has a different lead melody, but that's it. just listen to the bass on both songs. im not quite sure about the actual notes, but the progression is identical. im sorry to burst any bubbles. hopefully the vocals and the rest of the song will rescue it from epic failure

what appears to be the chorus sounds REALLY boring and generic. i don't like the melody over the recycled "what i've done" bass-progression. actually the whole snippet feels like a "what i've done"-ripoff in my opinion.

i have literally no expectations in new lp anymore, so i just have the alternative of being surprised in a positive way. it's good to hear something REALLY new by them, though.

i didn't see this coming but have to thank you guys. im glad to see that user concerns can move something. will be posting here again