"Good Things Go" Live Video

[leftshoe18]

53 minutes ago, linkin_boss said:

Yup, the messenger was brought 2 whole tones down.

 

And it's so much better than the album version.

[aaaaaaA]

For some reason, I consider this song one of the least favorite of the album. I'm happy for y'all liking it, but I feel that those high pitch verses made me feel that way. 

I'm hoping for "Casualty". 

Edited yesterday at 04:38 AM by aaaaaaA

[Trumtram]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but there was no other song in LP's discography, where they changed the pitch for their live performance. At least I can't recall any cases from the first three albums, but I'm not an expert. "The Messenger" is most certainly one of these cases, even though the song itself was never meant to be played live like on the studio version, it's a special thing.

 

I'm just confused on why they would record a song for their comeback album (intending to play it live), only to not being able to actually sing it? What's the point?

 

@JZLP common practice? Nah. Singer's get pitch corrected in studio versions, but usually a song gets performed live in the way the studio version is.

 

I mean, it's all good, the majority seems to be happy with it. I found the official live version to be a bit flat because of the change in pitch/tone/whatever.

Edited yesterday at 11:10 AM by Trumtram

[KeysToTheLinkinPark]

3 minutes ago, Trumtram said:

I mean, it's all good, the majority seems to be happy with it. I found the official live version to be a bit flat because of the change in pitch/tone/whatever.

I agree. 

[leftshoe18]

50 minutes ago, Trumtram said:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but there was no other song in LP's discography, where they changed the pitch for their live performance. At least I can't recall any cases from the first three albums, but I'm not an expert. "The Messenger" is most certainly one of these cases, even though the song itself was never meant to be played live like on the studio version, it's a special thing.

 

I'm just confused on why they would record a song for their comeback album (intending to play it live), only to not being able to actually sing it? What's the point?

 

@JZLP common practice? Nah. Singer's get pitch corrected in studio versions, but usually a song gets performed live in the way the studio version is.

 

I mean, it's all good, the majority seems to be happy with it. I found the official live version to be a bit flat because of the change in pitch/tone/whatever.

It's very possible they tried rehearsing it in the studio version's key and realized it was too difficult to consistently perform live that way. While bands tend to mostly stick with the original key of songs when performing them live, there are plenty of songs from plenty of bands that have only ever been performed live in a different key for one reason or another.

[Trumtram]

5 minutes ago, leftshoe18 said:

It's very possible they tried rehearsing it in the studio version's key and realized it was too difficult to consistently perform live that way.

That's a fair point.

[LPLStaff]

I think it's just as simple as that. We were spoiled with Chester for so long - he was truly iconic.

[Paigeinpark]

On 2/25/2025 at 3:31 PM, LeonardoMF93 said:

Now, since the album's release, we haven't had any new music videos. Are we not getting any more?

have they ever made music videos for any non-single? id guess on the ATS but i cant remember tbh

i feel like the two songs that could have MVs would either be Good Things Go (a fan favorite) or maybe Casualty (first non single to be played live)

[JerseyShore]

6 hours ago, LPLStaff said:

I think it's just as simple as that. We were spoiled with Chester for so long - he was truly iconic.

For sure. We could either be watching Forgotten at RAR 01 on repeat or listening to brand new awesome LP songs that have only be played live like 4 times, but are down a key or a touch off the album version. Or both. I know which side I would vote for.