Wow nice work Serg! The ":" in the sources were not meant to be bold but that doesn't matter.
I noticed the tons of empty lines too, must have been a lot work!
What I said was meant generally, not concerning your recording.
All I said about your recording was that I didn't take a closer look at it.
For Chula Vista, I know it doesn't meet to current requirements, but it's from 2004, there is barely any digicam from that year and tour.
The digicam recordings give me a really hard time. I'm not saying that they all suck, but I think they need to meet some requirements. Most people at concerts just record snippets. That's not an attempt to record the show in its entirety or at least a try to do that, thus that's not a source for me. The number of those short recordings is like infinite.
So I decide that for every case, cause if haven't set up concrete rules.
- I think it has to have a certain length like 1/3 of the show or something like that at least.
- It has to be watchable, having a good resolution and frame rate.
And I think it has to have some songs recorded in row and not like snippets of all songs.
Plus I have to review them all which is really hard sometimes to find samples and stuff for those recordings.
Sometimes it just scares me what some people have in their lists...
I have to admit I did not check out Astats recording yet.
I think LP (or at least Mike) is well aware what's going on lately, just look at all the hints Mike gave away recently, but this is a label thing. The band can't say "let it be" and they will do it.
Crank part 2? Fuck yeah! I thought it was impossible but apparently it isn't lol, just look at the story. But it looks totally kickass, loved the first one. Plus another cameo and GU on the soundtrack, haha even better.
Nudity? I didn't see any. Black tape over breasts is not nudity
@ all future posters. If you have nothing more to say than 'fuck warner' or anything like it, don't comment at all. Thank you.
EDIT: Sad to see that the label took this step, and even the whole court way. If it was really for copyright they could close like almost all the LP fansites if they wanted.
That just shows, if they want your site closed they find a reason.
I'm pretty sure Maze traded it out, a few other people had it before Nick got his version, so they had to have it from Maza. Fun fact is, someone kinda owes me exactly the same too, but I got over it, I don't care anymore.
The thing for Nashville is, I want to do it since a while now, but no one can tell me concrete differences between those transfers. Don't know who added this comment anyway.
Because people tend to lie. There is no proof he recorded it, and until that it won't appear as source. He might have said it but I heard something else. I know he was there but didn't record cause it was heavily raining as we all know, which explains a lot.
I noticed that too, the whole thing is fucked up anyway, just look at the colors and all that.
It's not extra hands, it's more like a ghost effect from previous frames.
Added a whole bunch of banners recently.
28.05.2001 Washington - Fixed 'In the End' and edited the source comment.
06.03.2003 TOTP - Corrected 5th to 6th
07.08.2008 Phoenix - Removed source 1, source 2 renamed to 1 plus a little editing on the info.
I'll review it and decide to add it or not, not every digicam/mobile phone recording makes it to the guide
EDIT: Well it's the wrong sample on that page lol