Jump to content
anjum

Multitracks List

Recommended Posts

The problem is that they risk losing the source and being shunned by the trading community. Then there's of course the whole legal question and also the danger of other people, who downloaded the leaks, making physical copies of them and selling them online.

And people that aren't in the scene don't understand this and think we're all assholes because we're not sharing all the rarities. But it's not as easy as it sounds, sometimes. .__.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is that they risk losing the source and being shunned by the trading community. Then there's of course the whole legal question and also the danger of other people, who downloaded the leaks, making physical copies of them and selling them online.

And people that aren't in the scene don't understand this and think we're all assholes because we're not sharing all the rarities. But it's not as easy as it sounds, sometimes. .__

 

Yay for double-posting...^^

Edited by Seelentau

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I'm not saying I would rather this stuff not surface at all. I've bought things from traders in the past, LP related as well as non-LP related.

 

It is different then selling rare physical stuff though. If someone bought...let's say the shopping cart version of the Xero tape. That would sell for a lot of money today, but it's not undeserved profit, because they bought it. That's like selling rare baseball cards or something. It's not illegal.

 

Selling multitracks or instrumentals can get the seller in real legal trouble with record labels if they are exposed. That's another reason the prices are so high when these things are sold.

 

 

ALLLLL that said, though, I'll repeat that it's better than this stuff not surfacing at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Seelentau said:

The problem is that they risk losing the source and being shunned by the trading community. Then there's of course the whole legal question and also the danger of other people, who downloaded the leaks, making physical copies of them and selling them online.

And people that aren't in the scene don't understand this and think we're all assholes because we're not sharing all the rarities. But it's not as easy as it sounds, sometimes. .__.


I know, as A FACT, that Mike and Linkin Park, doesn't care about instrumentals, acapellas or even multitracks getting released, trust me i know, so with that said i think that anybody who want's to "sell" oficial stuff, should be banned or busted, this material is not theirs, this guys get those things from the radio and promotional stuff, they don't spet 1 pent to get those files, it's not fair

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can understand if someone want to sell a live show, which he recorded (even if that is still not 100% legal).
But how much you have to be bitch, to request any money for instrumentals/multitracks.

Edited by martinez

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, kennjii said:


I know, as A FACT, that Mike and Linkin Park, doesn't care about instrumentals, acapellas or even multitracks getting released

This isn't true at all. Last year they went through every HT and OML multitrack shared on Reddit and removed everything. They weren't happy with the fact that someone was leaking their shit. Before selling their gear, they also asked the company to remove all their original sounds from the instruments. Luckly for us, they didn't do their job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, kennjii said:


I know, as A FACT, that Mike and Linkin Park, doesn't care about instrumentals, acapellas or even multitracks getting released

 

Leaking this stuff is illegal simply because the leakers don't hold the copyright to it.

It doesn't matter what the band thinks about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, lpliveusername said:

This isn't true at all. Last year they went through every HT and OML multitrack shared on Reddit and removed everything. They weren't happy with the fact that someone was leaking their shit. Before selling their gear, they also asked the company to remove all their original sounds from the instruments. Luckly for us, they didn't do their job.

But you meant the management and not the actual band, do you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, lpliveusername said:

This isn't true at all. Last year they went through every HT and OML multitrack shared on Reddit and removed everything. They weren't happy with the fact that someone was leaking their shit. Before selling their gear, they also asked the company to remove all their original sounds from the instruments. Luckly for us, they didn't do their job.

WARNER BROS removed the content, NOT LINKIN PARK, the LABEL wanna profit with this stuff, wich sometimes they can't, that's the true, the band itself doesn't care at all!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Seelentau said:

 

Leaking this stuff is illegal simply because the leakers don't hold the copyright to it.

It doesn't matter what the band thinks about it.

but worst than leak it, it's sell it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×